Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science - Hallo sahabat Latest modern science, Pada Artikel yang anda baca kali ini dengan judul Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science, kami telah mempersiapkan artikel ini dengan baik untuk anda baca dan ambil informasi didalamnya. mudah-mudahan isi postingan
Artikel critiques, yang kami tulis ini dapat anda pahami. baiklah, selamat membaca.
Judul : Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
link : Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
I tweeted these suggestions back to Jessica, which I have slightly elaborated on here.
A good design practice is to put things where the reader will need them. With only one reference, why not put it where the reader encounters it, in context: on the left column of text, instead of at the end of poster?
The �point of need� principle also means keeping related objects together. I like text describing results directly above or below figures, rather than all figures in one column. See this post for another example. Similarly, the statistical results could be put in the white space of the graphs, or in the caption, rather than in separate text in the results on the right, at some distance from the graphs.
Try removing the bullet points, and use normal sentences and paragraphs instead. PowerPoint, despite its name, often handles bullet lists fairly inelegantly, with strange indents.
Maybe the graphs could have same light blue background with no lines around them, so they would match the text boxes. This would mean picking the right colours for the graphs to match the blues. The figure in the left column might be a little more tricky to harmonize, but would be worth considering if it could be done.
Are the columns the same width? The right one looks narrower.
If you leave figures in central column, maybe you could consolidate the text boxes in the right and left columns into one box, not 2-3.
I wonder if you could have a stronger take home message. �Different otters are different� seems less memorable than you might like.
Try bolding everything you�ve underlined. As in, bold, instead of underline, not in addition to.
In a species name, �sp.� should not be italicized (see last bullet point under �Results: Season�).
Update, 3 May 2014: With a little advice and feedback, Jessica won the poster competition! Here is the final version she took to the conference, which you can see incorporates some of the feedback above.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science dengan alamat link https://twistedhub.blogspot.com/2014/04/latest-modern-science-critique-sea.html
Judul : Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
link : Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
Jessica Hale tweeted this poster (click to enlarge) for the 2014 Northwest Student Society for Marine Mammalogy annual meeting with a request to make it, and I quote, �suck less�:I tweeted these suggestions back to Jessica, which I have slightly elaborated on here.
A good design practice is to put things where the reader will need them. With only one reference, why not put it where the reader encounters it, in context: on the left column of text, instead of at the end of poster?
The �point of need� principle also means keeping related objects together. I like text describing results directly above or below figures, rather than all figures in one column. See this post for another example. Similarly, the statistical results could be put in the white space of the graphs, or in the caption, rather than in separate text in the results on the right, at some distance from the graphs.
Try removing the bullet points, and use normal sentences and paragraphs instead. PowerPoint, despite its name, often handles bullet lists fairly inelegantly, with strange indents.
Maybe the graphs could have same light blue background with no lines around them, so they would match the text boxes. This would mean picking the right colours for the graphs to match the blues. The figure in the left column might be a little more tricky to harmonize, but would be worth considering if it could be done.
Are the columns the same width? The right one looks narrower.
If you leave figures in central column, maybe you could consolidate the text boxes in the right and left columns into one box, not 2-3.
I wonder if you could have a stronger take home message. �Different otters are different� seems less memorable than you might like.
Try bolding everything you�ve underlined. As in, bold, instead of underline, not in addition to.
In a species name, �sp.� should not be italicized (see last bullet point under �Results: Season�).
Update, 3 May 2014: With a little advice and feedback, Jessica won the poster competition! Here is the final version she took to the conference, which you can see incorporates some of the feedback above.
Demikianlah Artikel Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
Sekianlah artikel Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science kali ini, mudah-mudahan bisa memberi manfaat untuk anda semua. baiklah, sampai jumpa di postingan artikel lainnya.
Anda sekarang membaca artikel Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science dengan alamat link https://twistedhub.blogspot.com/2014/04/latest-modern-science-critique-sea.html
Latest modern science | Critique: Sea otters - Si Bejo Science
4/
5
Oleh
Unknown
