Home / All Post

Kamis, 27 Februari 2014

Kamis, 20 Februari 2014

Latest modern science | The excellent, the bad, and the generic - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment
Jillian Deines went looking for inspiration for her posters the way most of us try to solve problems now. She searched on Google. Because Google customizes search results, my hits might not look exactly like hers, but this is what I got when I looked for �scientific posters� (click to enlarge):


Not exactly an inspiring collection. Then, up in the corner, it offers hope!A collection of related images on excellent scientific posters! I visiting those images, and...


Um. I can�t say these stand out as particularly stunning. At the least, most look far too dense.

The first image also offered me a chance to look at bad scientific posters. I went and looked at those, and...


Again, I don�t see a lot of differences in what�s on display in the excellent set of search results, the bad, and the generic.

The lesson here? I�m not sure. Maybe it�s that the difference between a good poster and a bad one is about the details, not the general layout. Maybe it�s that there are very few truly expertly designed posters, for reasons that I�ve discussed on the blog (scientists are amateurs at design, short time frame, and so on).

Kamis, 13 Februari 2014

Latest modern science | Critique: Flowers and seeds - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment
Today�s two posters are from Nicole Soper Gorden, who generously sent these forward. Here�s one of her old ones, which you can click to enlarge:


Nicole calls this poster �perfectly serviceable,� which is an assessment I agree with. She writes:

They have lots of pictures, but are still somewhat boring (and have lots of boxes!)... basically all of my old posters followed the same design, with the same background and color scheme, etc.

The design here is clear: three clean columns, with no ambiguity about what to read next. It is somewhat staid because of the boxes separating all the text, and the text is slightly dense in a couple of places.

About the next poster, which was made for the Ecological Society of America meeting, Nicole wrote:

I tried something completely new, hoping to draw a crowd.

I have to say that it did work as intended � I had a lot of people stop by my poster and say something along the lines of, �Your poster caught my attention from across the room � it�s so pretty I had to know what it was about!� Yay for results.  :)
This is superb:


I love the big title in the big banner. You simply cannot miss it, which is critical in a big meeting. The Ecological Society of America is one of the bigger biology conferences out there, and the bigger the meeting, the bigger the title needs to be.

I also love the gently curved columns. The margins between make it clear that each one is a column, but the curves add some excellent visual interest. Curves are tricky to lay out, so not many people use them, and fewer use them well. Nicole obviously checked quite carefully to make the text follow the curves closely, so there are no jagged edges or gaps. The layout of the graphs is also very careful, so that they create the �corners about to pop the balloon� tension that I�ve notices in other posters trying to use circles and ovals.

The central column is meant to be read in three rows within the column. This could have been a disaster: changing the reading order can be confusing. The use of headings and dividing lines make the reading order clear.

Within the central column, I might have not used highlight boxes (e.g., the ones showing the highlighted values in the bottom two graphs), and just used the plain text against the blue background.

But while I might do a few things differently, there�s no doubt that this is an extremely well thought-out and beautiful poster. It certainly is an improvement over the one at the top.

Related posts

The eye loves the circle
Critique: Italian cemeteries
Critique: Bison dung fungus

Kamis, 06 Februari 2014

Latest modern science | Wanna do graphics? Pease�s book more about the job than the work - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment
I continue to hunt for introductory books on graphic design to give academics who have avoided anything even closely resembling �art� classes a way into the craft of design. As I wrote before, kids� books are often great introductions, as they are often more concise and readable than their adult counterparts.

Design Dossier: Graphic Design for Kids covers some of the basic tools like grids, typefaces, and colour. But big chunks of the book are more inspirational than instructional.

A fair amount of the space in the book is devoted to career counseling. It tells the reader, �If you wanted to be a graphic designer as a profession when you grow up, you should...�. Another big chunk of the book is devoted to �Graphic design milestones,� which is a short history. Mostly, it shows decade-by-decade trends, from the art nouveau of the early twentieth century to the current �digital age.�

The book has some playful elements, like interviews with designers printed on big read pull-out cards. There�s also a nice step-by-step case study, and suggested projects.

Because this book is more about graphic design as a job than the work that goes into graphic design, it probably wouldn�t be satisfying for an adult with a job (like an academic) who just needs an introduction to the lingo and major dos and don�ts.

Related posts

Go now! Kidd�s book a wonderful intro

Kamis, 30 Januari 2014

Latest modern science | Link roundup for January 2014 - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment

If you want your poster to look modern, try using fonts that were designed in this century. MyFonts has a list of their most popular fonts from last year. Many of them are display fonts (like the gorgeous Desire), but several text fonts are there, too, like Metro Nova (above) and Corbert. And by the way, the regular and italic versions of Corbert are free!


Speaking of the �Best of 2013,� Business Insider picks its favourite logo makeovers of last year. The overarching trend? Simplify. (Their list of bad logos includes many I�ve seen before at I Can Haz Cheezburger.)


That said, you don�t have to worry too much about making your poster look distinct. John McWade reminds us that many famous logos are very similar, and that�s okay. John writes about the three logos above:

All three are foods or beverages that come in small cans, yet note this: No one mistakes one for the other. None of us brings home a can of chicken noodle when we went for a Coke.

The Conference Mentor is a blog devoted to helping conference organizers! To date, however, there are no posts on how to make a good poster session, something that some organizers apparently need, judging from some of the dubious decisions I�ve featured here.

I recently reviewed Go, and have a review of Graphic Design for Kids in the works. One that things that both book emphasize is documenting things that you see, building a collection of design inspiration. Joyce Lee reminds us of the importance of documenting: you have a smartphone. Use it (but without the flash)!

If you happen to be at a conference at this time of year, even one in a supposedly usually mild climate with no snow on the ground, you may want some advice on how to keep warm.

You may want to read this article about creative differences between two typeface creators for the surprisingly fun comments section. Hat tip to Doc Becca.

Kamis, 23 Januari 2014

Latest modern science | Critweets: Neuroscience 2013 - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment
Here is another reason that all conferences should all have:


When your conference has a Twitter hashtag, it makes it easy for people to tweet pictures of themselves standing next to their poster. And when people do this, it provides a whole new way to give feedback. I did a bit of this for the Neuroscience meeting last fall, as I was following the #SfN13 hashtag.

For instance, here�s one from Dustin Green (click to enlarge):


I wouldn�t have stopped at this poster unless the subject matter was very relevant to my research interests. Too much text, set too small!

This one is from Teo Resstel:


Even when I enlarged this picture, I could not read the title. This is terrible at a big meeting like Neuroscience: the bigger the meeting, the bigger the title, because people are more likely to be walking by farther away. (Neuroscience, to its credit, has wide walkways between posters, something many conferences should emulate.) This turned out to be a printing problem.

This one is from Yes! Outreach.


The jumping figure and exclamation point are dark. So is the text. The presenter said, �It�s actually not too bad close up,� but in a poster session, you have to be able to convince people to stop first before they can see it close up. I wouldn�t have stopped at this one, either.

If you want a superfast reaction to your conference poster, you can always tweet me at @DoctorZen!

Kamis, 16 Januari 2014

Latest modern science | Critique: Behaviour 2013 conference poster competition winner - Si Bejo Science

Add Comment
This poster won the competition at the Behaviour 2013 meeting back in August. (Yes, cleaning out some draft posts...) Poster competitions are usually judged on a mix of science and graphics, and I am only paying attention to the latter here. Alas, I almost feel this poster is a �Greatest Hits� of things I warn against.

Click to enlarge:


I like the monochrome colour palette, which seems to reflect the colours of the jackdaw, whose picture provides a nice entry point for the reader. On the downside, this poster seems to get darker near the bottom, and I worry about this being too dark. Maybe that�s just the lighting it was photographed in.

The headings are very large, which helps guide the eye through the viewing order at a glance. However, I dislike that they are actually bigger and bolder than the title, which violates the expected hierarchy. Nothing should be bigger than the title. The title is also fighting with an author picture, yet another institutional logo, and it isn�t centered on the page. The author credits are far too close to the line dividing the title and the text.

The figure in the middle is useful in making it clear that this poster is meant to be read in rows, but I badly wish that the rows and columns were even. I would even be mollified if the space between the �Introduction� and �Methods� wasn�t noticeably wider than the margin between the �Results� and �Conclusion.� For goodness sake, please use grids!

And there are boxes around the text. At least there is only one level of boxes... But honestly, there is one place where I think a box might have helped. There is also a clear mismatch in colour between the next box and the rest of the background. That it looks like an attempt was made to match the two makes the mismatch all the more annoying. I might have tried to put a box around the nest on the theory that if you can�t hide an edge, make it a definite one.

This is representative of the state of the art in conference posters, which is disappointing.
Langganan: Postingan (Atom)