Senin, 30 Desember 2013

Latest modern science | New Year�s Resolution: No more Comic Sans! - Si Bejo Science

Regular readers know that I love comics, but hate Comic Sans. A lot of academics use it because they want something that looks handwritten, and they don�t have anything else on their computer that fills the bill.

No more excuses. Make a New Year�s resolution to never put Comic Sans on a poster (or a slide) again. You can start that resolution by getting some new fonts specifically made by and for professional comic book letterers. Richard Starkings of ComicCraft is having a sale!


The New Year�s Sale is at ComicBookFonts.com. Fonts are a mere twenty bucks and 14 cents. ($20.14... get it?) There are lots of other resources there that may interest poster makers, too, like this one on reading flow.

And nobody paid me to say that, either!

External links

ComicBookFonts.com

Kamis, 26 Desember 2013

Latest modern science | Link roundup for December 2013 - Si Bejo Science

Fonts have feelings too� is a nice look at typography by Mikael Cho (hat tip to Julie Dirksen). I am indebted for it sharing this visual on text legibility, originally from here:


Namnezia has a nice take on what a poster is for, and why you shouldn�t hold back on presenting stuff on it:

(A poster) is not a press release, or pre publication. Rather it is a chance to present your work and get your colleagues excited about it.

Apparently, many poster authors get their work done here. From I Can Haz Cheezburger.


The difference between screen and print. ICHC again.

ICHC is on a roll.


And I�ve got one more, showing the power of proximity is great. Do not abuse it! Courtesy of Scott Jordan Harris:


The American Society for Cell Biology has a little rationale and tutorial for putting a poster in the cloud. It emphasizes figshare, which has been featured on the blog before.

ACNP spotted this creative and interesting poster tube:

Kamis, 12 Desember 2013

Latest modern science | The one inch rule - Si Bejo Science

Latest modern science | The one inch rule - Si Bejo Science

One of the most common problems on posters is that things are too close together, which creates the impression of clutter. Let me propose an easy to remember rule for you.

Every element on the poster should have one inch between it and anything else.

The tricky part is to determine what makes up an �element.� For instance, I would treat the following as single �elements.�

  • The title, author credits, and institutional affiliations.
  • A heading and the text below it.
  • A figure and its caption or legend.
  • A column.
Examples of different �elements� that should have one inch of space between them:

  • The title and any logo.
  • The authors list or institutional affiliations and the text below it.
  • The bottom of one section of text and the next heading.
  • Every picture or graph, top and bottom, left and right.
  • Separate columns.
Here�s a quick way to check. Sinply draw a long, skinny, one inch box. Or maybe two: one horizontal, and one vertical. Send these boxes to the �back� layer so nothing autoflows around them. Drag them anywhere to make sure there is enough separation.


Kamis, 05 Desember 2013

Latest modern science | Identifying poster authors: conference organizers, ask for ORCIDs! - Si Bejo Science

I�m lucky. I have an unusual name. The only other Faulkes I know in biology is Chris Faulkes, who does research on mole rats. While I paid the price for having an unusual name in elementary school, I am now reaping a benefit: it�s easy to find my research online.

I feel for K.L. Smith. She told this on Story Collider:

I had just published my master�s thesis under my maiden name, �Smith.� And I was looking in Web of Science to try to find my publication, but there were over 90,000 papers by K.L. Smith. So I was just lost.

I�m not an old fashioned person, I hadn�t wanted to change my last name, but I have to admit, when I was a kid, I used to dream of having an exotic last name, because I was kind of tired of getting lost in the sea of Smiths.

Things started to go well, and we were talking on OK Cupid, and I remember asking Zach what his last name was, and I was already kind of like falling for him, �cause I thought he was great, and he wrote back, and he was like, �My last name is �Weiner.��

And I was like, �This is not what I had in mind.�

But anyway, so then I checked Web of Science to check how many Weiners there were, right? Because if you�re going to take that name, you don�t want to take that hit for nothing. ... But it turns out there�s a lot of Weiners out there. So taking the name Weiner wasn�t really going to help me out that much. It would cut a couple of thousand off, but yeah, I�m not going to take that hit for nothing. But there�s no Weinersmith � all one word. And so, and I thought that was really hilarious, actually, because I�m 12 inside.

And we decided to call ourselves the Weinersmiths for the sake of my career, but I wasn�t going down alone, so I took him down with me. So at that point we became the Weinersmiths.

Kelly�s story is a great example of why we need ORCID. For those who don�t have one yet (and you should get one), ORCID is sort of an author�s serial number. Its goal is to distinguish which of the 90,000 papers by K.L. Smith were written by Kelly Weinersmith, formerly Smith, who told the story above.

I am thankful to Mike Taylor, tweeted:

Academic conference organisers. Nearly 400,000 ORCIDs have been created in a year. Collect them. Use them. Please.

So far, I have yet to see a single conference that asks for my ORCID, even for conferences that intend to publish the abstracts. Conference abstracts are increasing becoming archived rather than being ephemeral, so it would be valuable to start connecting them to specific authors in a systematic way.

P.S.—If you are interested in the forum that Kelly told her story, become a patron of Story Collider!

External links

ORCID
Two nerds fall in love (Name story starts at about 8 minutes in)

Kamis, 28 November 2013

Latest modern science | Link roundup for November 2013 - Si Bejo Science

I�ve featured posters from Michael Barton here and here. Here�s another great description of his process, and the result is this nice poster he did last year. (Hat tip to Sam Evans.)


ScientifFig claims to produce publication ready figures. We�ll see.

Holly Bik looks at dress style. While she frames it in the context of job interviews, it can also apply to times when you're giving a poster presentation.

Peter Tennant has evidence about what going to a conference can do for you. Correlation is not causation, but still...

The Neuroscience conference is the biggest congregation of posters in the world, so here are selected tweets:

Nicky Pentilla ponders travel:

Shoe test for #SfN13: Can I walk the poster floor in them without wincing by the end?

As does Kristen Delevich:

Must stop using my poster tube as a walking stick.

Ed Wilson, Jr., reminds us that you�re there to present, not talk.

It�s incredibly frustrating when presenting author socializes rather than being avail to discuss work during poster session.

Similarly, Taking a Cat Apart asks that you not drop names.

Dude, you really don�t need all the name dropping when you talk me through your poster. It�s cool by itself. Relax.

Phat Ma notes that you should also ask about what isn�t shown on a poster:

I usually get more value from talking to people about the data they aren't showing than from the graphs on the poster.

Drug Monkey has a handout tip:

If you don't have page sized copies of your #SFN13 poster to hand out you are screwing up.

Still, one might go too far. Felipe Gerhard saw an optimistic presenter:

Saw somebody having approximately 500 printed hand-outs of his poster.

Valerie Thompson has presentation advice:

Ask visitors how familiar they are with your work before launching into your spiel, and adjust accordingly.

Unfortunately, Doc Becca found presenters who hadn�t taken heed of Valerie�s advice. Remember, presenters, to get to the point!

Poster spiel in 2 min or my brain starts to drift. Figure it out, folks.

Adam Calhoun reminds you all to show up to your session!

Worm community you�re letting me down! I went to three C. elegans posters this afternoon, and one had no presenter while other two posters totally missing!

This might be music to the ears of Bob Graybeard, who indulges in imposteration:

Sometimes I'll pick an unattended #SfN13 poster at random and present the shit out of it, just to prove I can.

And not being by your poster that could be a bad movie if My T CHondria is around; if you're not by your poster:

If you aren't standing by your poster, I'll assume you want me to just leave my comments on it with Sharpie.

Kamis, 21 November 2013

Latest modern science | Dynamic posters at Neuroscience 2013 - Si Bejo Science

Latest modern science | Dynamic posters at Neuroscience 2013 - Si Bejo Science

As one of, if not the, biggest scientific meeting and poster presentation venue in the world, the Neuroscience meeting has every incentive to be at the forefront of developing new ways to give posters. Previously, I�d noted they had plans to allow authors to show posters on a screen. These have been dubbed �dynamic posters.�

Stavros Hadjisolomou shares his experience with dynamic posters at the most recent Neuroscience meeting in San Diego.

The Society for Neuroscience asked presenters to upload their presentations in Powerpoint or PDF files only to a specific website. Each presenter had to create an account and once logged in there were certain steps to be followed:

�Poster Submission Steps�
  • Instructions: guidelines on creating and submitting posters, details on file formats, appropriate text size, section content, videos etc.
  • Poster templates: They offered 3 possible templates, I chose to work on a previous poster I had.
  • Upload poster: Poster file.
  • Upload dynamic poster assets: media to accompany poster.
  • Preview poster: a chance to preview the poster before the meeting

Although they provided extended details on font sizes for headings and content, there were no instructions on poster dimensions. This was a bit of a problem since my initial draft was organized on a 48 inch by 36 inch slide, which looked really bad in �presentation mode� once uploaded. When viewed in presentation mode, the poster was stretched sideways and compressed vertically to fit the screen. This rendered the poster unreadable to say the least. I found from the offered templates that the dimensions are 52 by 29 inches.

In �presentation mode,� you can view the poster and bring up a gallery made up of the uploaded media files so the presenter could choose one to play.

Once finished, I uploaded 10 videos to be used for the poster. One important thing here: the site allowed for a lot of different media file types which made my life easier. Also, each file could be up to 900 megabytes, a pretty reasonable size. Having said this, some files did not stream well with certain browsers. I had to test the ones that worked best (Firefox and Chrome).

My presentation was on Sunday and generally it was a great experience. The poster was about squid behavior (startle escape response � startle chromatophore changes).

Having videos to show to visitors made my life easier and, from what I have heard from people, more enjoyable to them. When it comes to animal behaviour, having videos to showcase your points allows for better communication. I did not spend as much time on creating editing videos as on the poster itself; I kept videos to a max number of 10 (with a couple of �bloopers� for people who had enough time to stay and watch.)

People visited the poster in bursts. The types of people ranged from colleagues, to researchers in different fields but interested in cephalopods and people who had no idea about the poster but were drawn in by the videos; when I did not have any visitors, I ran a playlist of all the videos and soon enough, people would come and ask for a presentation. I had quite a few people who were on their way to another poster, yet stopped and asked for a quick presentation.

Sadly, the provided laptop, WiFi dongle, and display were not adequate for presenting the poster appropriately:

  • The screen did not match the laptop�s resolution. Although the presentation looked great on the laptop, the poster was slightly compressed on the display which made it unreadable. When I inquired with a technician, I was told that all dynamic posters had the same problem and it was to be fixed later. Most of the visitors commented on this issue. Having a printed poster is definitely one less headache, especially since you find out at the last minute.
  • The videos could not be streamed online efficiently. Since my videos were more than 500 megabytes, they did not stream fast enough, even though I was given access to a private wireless account. I brought three flash drives with me (just in case!) with the poster and video files and decided to play videos locally while displaying the poster in presentation mode.

Aside from this glitch, the dynamic poster presentation was great and would do it again in a heartbeat, assuming the display works properly next time. A lot of people showed interest to present their posters in this way for next year. Lastly, while this is a first step towards �dynamic� posters, I wish this would allow for more interactive presentations (something similar to, but not necessarily the same as Prezi).

Bakermind�s description seems a little different than Stavros�s:

This year they opted for conventional posters + iPads. Hope to receive more traffic.

Are dynamic posters ready for the main hall? Drugmonkey asked:

Anyone impressed by a �dynamic poster� yet?

Reactions on Twitter were... ambivalent, at best. Both Dr. PMS and SciTriGrrl reacted with an emphatic, �No.� Benjamin Saunders didn�t like them:

These dynamic posters just seem really dorky to me, not seeing the added value.

Taking a Cat Apart had a similar sentiment:

Still not entirely sure what�s dynamic about a dynamic poster.

 SciTriGrrl adding:

It�s a poster with zooming. WHERE ARE THE VIDEOS?

Apparently, not many presenters took advantage of the videos like Stavros did. However, Bashir noted that some posters did use videos, though maybe not well:

As far as I can tell dynamic posters are just a poster with a YouTube video added.


Observing the crowd, Bakermind noted that this format doesn�t seem to appeal:

Dynamic posters at #sfn13 often isolated... look lonely and I think some people scared away.

Dynamic posters are still a work in progress. There is no doubt in my mind that the technology exists to make a great dynamic poster. The question is whether even a big organization like the Society for Neuroscience, and authors, are willing to make the investment.

Related posts

As was foretold by prophecy