Kamis, 11 Desember 2014
Kamis, 04 Desember 2014
Latest modern science | Critique: Sex models - Si Bejo Science
critiquesYes, I totally went for the gutter headline in introducing this poster from Amanda Whitlock. This poster is used with her permission. You can click to enlarge!
Amanda included this note in her email:
I�m so pleased there is one less person in the world using PowerPoint for posters!
Amanda�s poster has a clean design. It starts with my favourite �hard to mess it up� layout: three columns, equal size.
I recently read an article that argued that anytime you overlay text on a picture, it should always be white text on top of the image. That message might be a good one for all poster makers. Especially when viewing this poster at a reduced size, I�m worried that the title (90% of your communication effort!) is barely visible. I tried a quick and dirty replacement of the black with white:
The edges of the text are badly pixelated because of the way I inverted the colours, but the title is more visible. Let�s try the same to the headings:
The difference is harder to see, but might be more obvious if made in the original document. The headings would also benefit from a bit of additional work to ensure that they are all evenly spaced. �Conclusions� looks closer to the bottom of its bar than �Results,� for example.
The same goes for the vertical alignment. A line that misses the letters in �Conclusion� hits letters in �References,� for instance.
While the poster has plenty of images and white space, it is a shame that the critical upper left corner is the least visually appealing part of the whole poster, with only text.
If you can�t see the title, and there is only words and data, it�s unlikely to gather any new readers who just happened to be walking by. While this poster will not make anyone cringe when they walk past it, they might just... walk past it.
Amanda included this note in her email:
After reading your blog, I switched from using Powerpoint to Scribus and have become a huge convert and evangelist on its behalf.
I�m so pleased there is one less person in the world using PowerPoint for posters!
Amanda�s poster has a clean design. It starts with my favourite �hard to mess it up� layout: three columns, equal size.
I recently read an article that argued that anytime you overlay text on a picture, it should always be white text on top of the image. That message might be a good one for all poster makers. Especially when viewing this poster at a reduced size, I�m worried that the title (90% of your communication effort!) is barely visible. I tried a quick and dirty replacement of the black with white:
The edges of the text are badly pixelated because of the way I inverted the colours, but the title is more visible. Let�s try the same to the headings:
The difference is harder to see, but might be more obvious if made in the original document. The headings would also benefit from a bit of additional work to ensure that they are all evenly spaced. �Conclusions� looks closer to the bottom of its bar than �Results,� for example.
The same goes for the vertical alignment. A line that misses the letters in �Conclusion� hits letters in �References,� for instance.
While the poster has plenty of images and white space, it is a shame that the critical upper left corner is the least visually appealing part of the whole poster, with only text.
If you can�t see the title, and there is only words and data, it�s unlikely to gather any new readers who just happened to be walking by. While this poster will not make anyone cringe when they walk past it, they might just... walk past it.
Kamis, 27 November 2014
Latest modern science | Link roundup for November 2014 - Si Bejo Science
link roundup posters on screens reuseNovember is the biggest conglomeration of posters in the world: the Neuroscience meeting. And there are always interesting poster-related tweets arising from that!
Here is a nice �Tips and tricks� for poster presentations blog post from Caitlin Kirkwood. She has obviously been to the rodeo that is neuroscience a few times:
Winner of �best new way to present a poster� (hat tip to MBF Bioscience):
Winner of �worst new way to present a poster� (hat tip to Jason Snyder):
Winner of �best new re-use of a poster� (hat tip to Rodrigo Braga):
Eric encapsulates how important the poster experience is to Neuroscience:
Jordan Gaines asks and interesting question about assessing your audience:
The Cellular Scale has advice for poster audience members:
Neurd Girls ?reports a crime to sfnpolice:
DrugMonkey reminds us of good design principles:
Michael Carroll makes an observation on poster presenters:
I�ve followed Neuroscience�s introduction of �dynamic posters� for some time now. Benjamin Saunders thinks people are still not making full use of the medium:
Jason Pipkin found one dynamic poster he liked:
Then there was that flight out that was stopped by posters! Fear them! Fear the posters! (Hat tip to Joshua Burda.)
Finally, a two part article by Erik Kennedy about designing user interfaces that has some good lessons for posters. I particularly appreciate rule 2:
And rule 3:
Rule 5 is particularly interesting, because it talks about text in a way I have never heard before, about combining emphasis (�up-pop�) with de-emphasis (�down-pop�). I think I might try this in some of my next posters.
This link goes to part one; this link goes to part two.
Here is a nice �Tips and tricks� for poster presentations blog post from Caitlin Kirkwood. She has obviously been to the rodeo that is neuroscience a few times:
(F)for those that appear in front of you haggard, with a glazed-over look in their eyes (the telltale signs of SfN-itis: too many posters, too little time), it is nice to have an abbreviated synopsis of your work ready.
Winner of �best new way to present a poster� (hat tip to MBF Bioscience):
Winner of �worst new way to present a poster� (hat tip to Jason Snyder):
Winner of �best new re-use of a poster� (hat tip to Rodrigo Braga):
Eric encapsulates how important the poster experience is to Neuroscience:
Feel naked without a poster tube. Thumb drives just don�t identify you as an#SFN14 attendee in the same way.
Jordan Gaines asks and interesting question about assessing your audience:
How do you like to assess someone's knowledge of your poster topic as you're presenting? Ask upfront, or read their body language?
The Cellular Scale has advice for poster audience members:
If you want a 5 min poster summary, ask for a 2 min one.
Neurd Girls ?reports a crime to sfnpolice:
I�d like to report a criminal offense. Poster entirely in Comic Sans on bright purple background.
DrugMonkey reminds us of good design principles:
Font size people, font size. #sfn14 #oldeyes
Michael Carroll makes an observation on poster presenters:
Interesting seniority gradient within the poster rows here at #SfN14: students and postdocs at the posters, PIs and greybeards in the center
I�ve followed Neuroscience�s introduction of �dynamic posters� for some time now. Benjamin Saunders thinks people are still not making full use of the medium:
Seeing some better #SfN14 dynamic posters this year but most are still just a poster. On a video screen. Get it together people.
Jason Pipkin found one dynamic poster he liked:
Title, intro, and conclusions always visible while large central area used for displaying series of movies.
Then there was that flight out that was stopped by posters! Fear them! Fear the posters! (Hat tip to Joshua Burda.)
American Airlines flight grounded due to unruly poster-wielding SFN�rs!! So many posters!!!
Finally, a two part article by Erik Kennedy about designing user interfaces that has some good lessons for posters. I particularly appreciate rule 2:
(D)esign black and white first. Start with the harder problem of making the app beautiful and usable in every way, but without the aid of color. Add color last, and even then, only with purpose.
And rule 3:
If you want to make UI that looks designed, you need to add in a lot of breathing room.Sometimes a ridiculous amount.
Rule 5 is particularly interesting, because it talks about text in a way I have never heard before, about combining emphasis (�up-pop�) with de-emphasis (�down-pop�). I think I might try this in some of my next posters.
This link goes to part one; this link goes to part two.
Jumat, 21 November 2014
Latest modern science | The case of the missing critique - Si Bejo Science
websitesRegular readers might notice that a post that had been put up earlier this week is no longer available.
The blog post in question was a critique of a poster archived at Academia.edu. The poster was from a conference back in 2011. I thought the poster was worth analyzing, and I wrote a blog post about it.
Today, I got an email from one of the authors of the post asking me to take it down, for reasons that do not need exploring at this juncture. I was asked why this post was done without mentioning I had permission of the authors to use the poster. This is something I normally mention in my critiques.
Most posters are submitted to me directly by the person who made them, sometimes before the conference. They may have unpublished data, and so on, and are not (as far as I know) otherwise available to viewers outside the conference itself. So I ask people who email things to me if I can use them on them here on the blog.
In contrast, this poster was archived in a public forum online. To my way of thinking, this made it available for public comment. I know that �on the Internet� does not mean �do what you want� (see this great article by Alex Wild) but I did not see any particular language anywhere on the site limiting re-use. (The poster is no longer available, so I can�t check if there was any such verbiage anywhere.)
I had no reason to ignore a polite request, so I took down the post.
The moral of the story? Not sure. Maybe it�s about being careful about what you archive and how, and managing your digital footprint. Maybe it�s about being more careful in doing due diligence in contacting people who might be affected by re-use.
External links
Bugging out: How rampant online piracy squashed one insect photographer
The blog post in question was a critique of a poster archived at Academia.edu. The poster was from a conference back in 2011. I thought the poster was worth analyzing, and I wrote a blog post about it.
Today, I got an email from one of the authors of the post asking me to take it down, for reasons that do not need exploring at this juncture. I was asked why this post was done without mentioning I had permission of the authors to use the poster. This is something I normally mention in my critiques.
Most posters are submitted to me directly by the person who made them, sometimes before the conference. They may have unpublished data, and so on, and are not (as far as I know) otherwise available to viewers outside the conference itself. So I ask people who email things to me if I can use them on them here on the blog.
In contrast, this poster was archived in a public forum online. To my way of thinking, this made it available for public comment. I know that �on the Internet� does not mean �do what you want� (see this great article by Alex Wild) but I did not see any particular language anywhere on the site limiting re-use. (The poster is no longer available, so I can�t check if there was any such verbiage anywhere.)
I had no reason to ignore a polite request, so I took down the post.
The moral of the story? Not sure. Maybe it�s about being careful about what you archive and how, and managing your digital footprint. Maybe it�s about being more careful in doing due diligence in contacting people who might be affected by re-use.
External links
Bugging out: How rampant online piracy squashed one insect photographer
Kamis, 13 November 2014
Latest modern science | A design brief for conference posters - Si Bejo Science
design
A good design brief talks not just about the nuts and bolts of a project, like deadline, budget, or size (�It has to fit on a standard piece of office paper�). Those can be in there, but a good design brief goes further. It includes a lot more about the goals of the project, the audience the project should engage with, and what the desired reaction of the audience is.
The instructions from most scientific conferences usually have some, but not all, of the elements for a good design brief for poster makers. Here is my attempt to flesh out a design brief for conference posters for the stuff they don�t put in the instructions.
Goals of a poster
Posters should get conference attendees to talk to the presenter. Because attendees are busy, posters must grab attention, even if a potential reader is quite a long way from the poster. Similarly, posters should make an implicit promise to the reader that the gist of the poster can be grasped quickly.Posters should also contain enough information that a person is able to read it and understand the main message.
Presentation setting
Conference posters are printed on paper and hung indoors, often under relatively dim artificial light that is not under the control of the presenter. They must be visible even under poor lighting conditions.The large number of people walking around means that the lower part of the poster may be obscured, so titles must be high and large to be seen by as many people from as far away as possible.
Audience characteristics
Conference attendees are smart, literate adults who are busy and distracted by the vast amount of material in a conference. They are often walking at some distance from the poster.A conference audience may have minor vision problems. Attendees range in age from 20 to 60 (or older), which means that some attendees probably need reading glasses for presbyopia. In some conferences, attendance skews towards greater numbers of men, which means a greater number of individuals may be colour blind, particularly red/green colour blind.
Values to communicate
Academics will generally want to convey an impression of rigor, thoughtfulness, thoroughness, and careful attention to detail. This can be done with humour or playfulness, as long as it never implies carelessness.
Colours and imagery
Colours should be visible to those who are colour blind. Many academics wish to have their posters reflect their institutional brands, which can be reflected in the colour palette of the poster.
External links
How to write an effective design brief
How do I write a good design brief?
How To Write An Effective Design Brief and Get The Design You Want!
How do you write a design brief?
Key information design agencies would love from their clients (Picture from this post)
7 Basics to Create a Good Design Brief
Kamis, 06 November 2014
Latest modern science | Critique: The data flow dragonfly - Si Bejo Science
critiquesToday�s poster is from Marianna Rapaport, and is shown with her permission. Click to enlarge!
Marianna writes:
I like this a lot. It�s clean, and has a strong visual impact. The dragonfly is a nice design touch. The use of the contrast colours orange and teal to highlight is consistent, and subtle enough not to be garish or overwhelming.
The one thing I question is the reading order. The "Result" box is not where I would expect it. Based on headings, I would go:
But based on its position on the poster, �Result� would slot in at position number 4, not 6. Marianna replied:
Having the results up top, as here, is not horrible. The approach I might have taken would be to think of that top row as the �take home� messages, and the second row as being �for the aficionado.� The trick then becomes distinguishing the two.
The gray band on the second row signals this a little, but it might have been stronger if there was a second cue to signal that the second row was less important. For example, a slightly smaller point size for the text might have helped.
Alternately, perhaps using different way to highlight the �Results� box, instead of the same gray as the row below, would have broken the connection between them, and emphasized that �Result� was meant to stand on its own, as a conclusion.
Still, the overall effect is quite lovely.
Marianna writes:
The poster presents my masters thesis, the general area is programming language research.The only illustrations in my thesis are graphs and math formulas. I wanted to add some graphics to the poster that would attract people (and not scare them away with math). My dad told me that my graph looked like the wings of a dragonfly, so that's where that big insect comes from.
I would also like to acknowledge the invaluable help of my friend Erica Dufour. She helped me to arrange the text boxes and came up with the idea of the gray background that helps the reader understand the order in which to read the material. She also helped me understand how to use Adobe Illustrator and InDesign.
Finally, I used the same font as in this poster on which you also have a critique on your blog
I like this a lot. It�s clean, and has a strong visual impact. The dragonfly is a nice design touch. The use of the contrast colours orange and teal to highlight is consistent, and subtle enough not to be garish or overwhelming.
The one thing I question is the reading order. The "Result" box is not where I would expect it. Based on headings, I would go:
- Summary
- Intro
- Goal
- Problem
- Method
- Result
But based on its position on the poster, �Result� would slot in at position number 4, not 6. Marianna replied:
I agree that the reading order is still unclear. But I don�t even know what could be done about that without changing the whole poster layout.
Regarding the �Result� box, I read somewhere (maybe even on your blog) that it�s a good idea to put the results right in the beginning; in a way, it�s a replacement for the abstract. I thought that in my case, the results are in the beginning and at the same time in the end. But maybe that doesn�t make sense because it�s impossible to understand the results without reading everything else, so you�re right there, too.
Having the results up top, as here, is not horrible. The approach I might have taken would be to think of that top row as the �take home� messages, and the second row as being �for the aficionado.� The trick then becomes distinguishing the two.
The gray band on the second row signals this a little, but it might have been stronger if there was a second cue to signal that the second row was less important. For example, a slightly smaller point size for the text might have helped.
Alternately, perhaps using different way to highlight the �Results� box, instead of the same gray as the row below, would have broken the connection between them, and emphasized that �Result� was meant to stand on its own, as a conclusion.
Still, the overall effect is quite lovely.
Kamis, 30 Oktober 2014
Latest modern science | Link roundup for October 2014 - Si Bejo Science
link roundup type crimesI don�t think I�d seen this resource on Giving Poster Presentations before. It�s part of a larger online resource on �English communication for scientists.� I think I�d remember if I�s seen this Jorge Cham gem from the front page before:
Elizabeth �Inkfish� Preston covers a paper that examines how a simple graph significantly increases the persuasiveness of an argument. And when I say �simple,� I mean very simple:
Another primer on how to get the most out of a conference from Mandi Stewart, which wins points for citing We Bought a Zoo:
This article on the importance of comics has some analysis of reading flow after my own heart. Hat tip to Siobhan O�Dwyer.
You too can learn the difference between a soft crop, a split crop, and a stickout crop in this post at the different ways you can crop an image by John McWade.
I also like McWade�s short reflection on how design can make life better:
Wired has a lovely profile on book cover designer Peter Mendelsund. Book covers have some goals that are similar to conference posters: attracting passers-by, for instance.
One of Mendelsund�s better known projects is The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. Here are some rejected ideas:
I have not seen the movie Idiocracy, but this post on making fake corporate logos is interesting just the same. Hat tip to Alex Jones and Amanda Krauss.
The Current radio show on CBC has been running a series called, �By Design.� It�s going to be running all this season. This series is not about graphic design, but is a wide ranging exploration of how we make things.
I�m months behind in bringing you this blog post on redesigning maps for the modern age.
If you�re finally ready to learn how to use a higher end graphics package than PowerPoint, try Vector Tutorials for Adobe Illustrator. Hat tip to Anthony Salvagno for this resource.
And today in type crimes, or �Someone did not read their directions closely enough�:
From here.
Elizabeth �Inkfish� Preston covers a paper that examines how a simple graph significantly increases the persuasiveness of an argument. And when I say �simple,� I mean very simple:
Another primer on how to get the most out of a conference from Mandi Stewart, which wins points for citing We Bought a Zoo:
My partner and I talk about having �five seconds of professional courage� when networking at conferences. Conferences are a great time to meet people, and unless you put yourself out there and introduce yourself, you could miss out on some great conversations. I love the movie �We Bought A Zoo� which is where having five seconds of professional courage came from. �You know, sometimes all you need is 20 seconds of insane courage. Just literally 20 seconds of just embarrassing bravery. And I promise you, something great will come of it.� Try it. Five seconds of professional courage.
This article on the importance of comics has some analysis of reading flow after my own heart. Hat tip to Siobhan O�Dwyer.
You too can learn the difference between a soft crop, a split crop, and a stickout crop in this post at the different ways you can crop an image by John McWade.
I also like McWade�s short reflection on how design can make life better:
Design is about more than whether something �works.� Lots of things �work.� A theater marquee with chipped paint and missing letters �works.� If the local strip mall has what I need, you could say its ugly plastic sign �works.� Each identifies my destination well enough to get there.
What they don�t provide is delight, inspiration, fulfillment.
Wired has a lovely profile on book cover designer Peter Mendelsund. Book covers have some goals that are similar to conference posters: attracting passers-by, for instance.
On one level, dust jackets are billboards. They�re meant to lure in potential readers. For a certain contingent of the publishing industry, this means playing it safe. �The path of least resistance when you�re designing a jacket is to give that particular demographic exactly what they want,� Mendelsund explains. �It�s a mystery novel, so you just splatter it in blood, and put the shadowy trench coat guy on it, and use the right typography.� Familiarity, the thinking goes, will always sell something.
Mendelsund does not subscribe to this view. He�s said that he prefers an ugly cover to a cliche one(.)
One of Mendelsund�s better known projects is The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo. Here are some rejected ideas:
I have not seen the movie Idiocracy, but this post on making fake corporate logos is interesting just the same. Hat tip to Alex Jones and Amanda Krauss.
The Current radio show on CBC has been running a series called, �By Design.� It�s going to be running all this season. This series is not about graphic design, but is a wide ranging exploration of how we make things.
I�m months behind in bringing you this blog post on redesigning maps for the modern age.
If you�re finally ready to learn how to use a higher end graphics package than PowerPoint, try Vector Tutorials for Adobe Illustrator. Hat tip to Anthony Salvagno for this resource.
And today in type crimes, or �Someone did not read their directions closely enough�:
From here.
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)
Artikel Terpilih
-
Today�s poster comes from Arunas Radzvilavicius , and is shown with his kind permission. Click to enlarge! The layout, the colour, the gener... -
How important are academic graphics? A new pre-print in arXiv argues, �Pretty damn important.� This news summary of the technical article ... -
This week�s contribution is from Zach Sperry, who gave me permission to share his poster from the 2015 Neuroscience meeting. Click to enlarg... -
I�m always on the lookout for re-use of posters, and Gary McDowell takes advantage of the new fabric ones: This poster scarf actually preda... -
A poster using augmented reality , courtesy of creator Stuart Eve. Stuart writes: I am of course not the first person to use AR in a poster,... -
This week�s contribution comes from Kenneth Chin. Click to enlarge! Let me get to a couple of good things before moving to the ways it could... -
Jessica Hale tweeted this poster (click to enlarge) for the 2014 Northwest Student Society for Marine Mammalogy annual meeting with a reque... -
Today�s poster come from Maxine Davis, which she did for a small conference. Click to enlarge! There are a couple of things that are very su... -
Signal boost! The American Geophysical Union just tweeted out a link to a virtual poster competition for undergraduates. You have to sign... -
Sometimes, people tell me, �I can�t follow the advice you have in the blog. There�s an institutional poster template , and they make me use ...